Building solo and not sure where to start?
Check public demand with posted budgets before guessing

Who this is for：Developers adding a Docker smoke test to Bitbucket Pipelines

• Local build and HTTP marker checks passed.
• Missing route and missing COPY source both failed as expected.
• Bitbucket Cloud execution and registry push remain untested.

Not yet verified：Bitbucket Cloud execution, registry push and deployment remain untested.

Who this is for：Developers handling recurring PDF-to-spreadsheet work

• Clean single-page tables: pdfplumber and pymupdf extract them perfectly in ~65ms -- off-the-shelf libraries already clear a high bar for this specific slice.
• Cross-page tables: none of the libraries stitch pages automatically. camelot's lattice mode got all 276 cells right; pdfplumber/pymupdf each truncated 11 cells, traced to the test document's own too-narrow column, not a general few-point overflow.
• Scanned tables: text-based libraries return nothing; adding OCR got 22/24 cells right but took 4.44s -- markedly slower, on a different input than the digital-text cases.

Not yet verified：Three synthetic documents cannot establish accuracy on customer files or willingness to pay.

Who this is for：Builders evaluating field-verification workflows

• Confirmis's own website claims 6,000+ trained verifiers already exist -- directly contradicting an earlier draft's 'no standing network' assumption, which has since been corrected.
• Three passive technical checks (geocoding, EXIF GPS, image tamper detection) each have real, testable limits -- including one confirmed directly: forging GPS coordinates with a free command-line tool took under half a second and completely fooled the location check.
• None of the three checks tested, alone or combined, supports a 'fraud-resistant' product claim.

Not yet verified：The tested checks do not establish fraud resistance; why such tasks keep being posted publicly remains unknown.